by Michael Bascombe
Grenada’s early exit from the
2009 CONCACAF Gold Cup may have been a disappointing start, but it should not
be viewed as the end of the road for football on the island.
Competing at this level for the
first time came at a cost. The national team conceded 10 goals in three matches
and failed to score. Yet, context is critical. Grenada was the smallest nation
ever to qualify for the tournament, a remarkable achievement in itself. Simply
reaching the Gold Cup signalled progress, and while the results were harsh, the
experience gained is invaluable.
History reminds us that difficult
introductions to the Gold Cup are not unique. Canada suffered an 8-0 defeat to
Mexico in 1993. Cuba conceded seven to Costa Rica in 1998. Jamaica and St
Vincent and the Grenadines endured heavy losses in their early appearances,
while Martinique also faced a 9-0 defeat. These nations regrouped, rebuilt, and
improved, and so too can Grenada.
Credit must go to head coach
Tommy Taylor and his staff, Kellon Baptiste, Andrew Munro, Kerlon Peters, and
Jerry Alexis, for their professionalism in guiding one of the youngest teams in
the competition. Notably, the performance against Honduras showed signs of
growth and resilience compared to earlier matches against the United States and
Haiti.
The responsibility now shifts to
the Grenada Football Association (GFA) to build on this foundation. Development
must be continuous, not reactionary.
Too often, national enthusiasm is
tied solely to victory. We celebrate when medals are won, but quickly fall
silent in moments of struggle. This “Monday morning quarterback” mentality
overlooks a fundamental truth: participation at the highest level is itself an
achievement.
Our support for athletes should
not be conditional. At times, our appreciation borders on hypocrisy, loud in
triumph, absent in adversity.
Just a year ago, Grenadian
athletes delivered commendable performances at the Beijing Olympic Games. Yet,
many of them, competing week after week on the international circuit, receive
little recognition. Athletes such as Neisha Bernard-Thomas, Randy Lewis, and
Patricia Sylvester continue to represent Grenada with pride, often without
sustained national acknowledgement.
Similarly, Alleyne Francique, in
his debut season as a coach at Texas A&M, guided his team to an NCAA
women’s title. Such accomplishments deserve national celebration.
The pattern is familiar. When
success fades, so does public enthusiasm. We saw it with global figures like Lewis
Hamilton, celebrated at his peak, but less supported during challenging
periods. The lesson is clear: true support endures beyond winning.
Closer to home, Grenada’s
Under-23 netball team recently returned after failing to defend its OECS
title. Their effort, commitment, and representation of the nation still merit
recognition.
The situation surrounding the
national football team is even more troubling. Just months after reaching the
Caribbean Cup final in Jamaica, with strong official support, the same players
were left struggling for basic resources. They faced difficulties securing a
suitable venue for an international friendly and reportedly had to cover their
own departure taxes to represent Grenada at the region’s premier tournament.
Ironically, facilities deemed
unavailable for football were later used for other events. Such contradictions
highlight the need for better planning, respect, and prioritisation.
National development cannot be
derailed by petty disagreements or short-term thinking.
At the same time, we celebrate
emerging stars like Kirani James, along with Nichkelia John and coach Albert
Joseph, for their achievements abroad. Their success will be met with fanfare, motorcades,
ceremonies, and national pride. But the real question remains: what happens
after the celebrations end?
Sustained support is the true
measure of national commitment.
Our athletes often compete as
amateurs against professionals, yet they carry the pride of a nation. They
deserve proper send-offs, consistent encouragement, and recognition whether
they win or lose.
Perhaps the time has come to
formalise that appreciation. A National Appreciation Day for Grenada’s
sportsmen and women could serve as a meaningful step toward recognising their
contributions and inspiring future generations.
If we are serious about sport as
a vehicle for national development, then our support must extend beyond the
scoreboard.

1 comment:
Same problem in TT. Sporting facilities should be used for sports only.
WG
Post a Comment