St George’s, Grenada, July 19, 2025 — The Grenada Football Association (GFA) has successfully concluded the FIFA Elite Coaches’ Workshop, a four-day programme aimed at raising the standard of football coaching on the island.
Saturday, July 19, 2025
Grenada Football Association (GFA) concludes Four-Day Elite Youth Coaches’ Workshop
Friday, July 18, 2025
CANOC Appeals For Change In CARICOM Heads' Approach To Sport
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
A Sobering Scorecard: West Indies’ Collapse and the Illusion of Administrative Fixe
![]() |
| Getty Images |
by Michael Bascombe
West Indies cricket suffered another humbling blow on Sunday, losing the third and final Test match against Australia by a crushing 176 runs at Sabina Park in Jamaica. Set a modest target of 204 runs for victory, the home side capitulated for a record-low second innings total of just 27 runs—one of the lowest in the history of Test cricket and a moment of deep embarrassment on Caribbean soil.
The defeat sealed a 3-0 series sweep for the visiting Australians, leaving fans across the region disheartened, frustrated, and searching—once again—for answers. And, as is often the case in times of crisis, the calls for administrative change have grown louder.
There are always those who believe that changing administrators will magically reverse the decline of West Indies cricket. Whether it was Sir Wes Hall, Sir Julian Hunte, Dave Cameron, Ricky Skerritt, or now Dr Kishore Shallow at the helm, there exists a stubborn belief that rotating leadership at the top will somehow produce instant victories on the field.
But this view, though emotionally understandable, is deeply flawed.
History has shown us that leadership alone cannot fix deeply entrenched structural issues. It reminds me of the days when fans in Grenada would call for the dismissal of Ashley “Ram” Folkes or Cheney Joseph every time the national football team lost a match. But even with new faces at the top, the results remained largely unchanged. That’s because success requires more than just a fresh nameplate on an office door—it demands a comprehensive strategy, sustained investment, and, most importantly, a shift in mindset.
Even if we were to gather every West Indies cricket legend—Richards, Lara, Holding, Ambrose—and give them leadership positions today, there would be no immediate renaissance. Why? Unless there is a fundamental change in the attitude, discipline, and commitment of the current crop of players, the cycle of mediocrity will continue.
Talent, which the Caribbean has never lacked, is not the issue. The problem lies in the execution, preparation, and professional culture surrounding the game. Without the hunger to compete at the highest level, the willingness to put in the hard work, and the respect for the maroon jersey, past glories can only serve as nostalgic reminders, not solutions to the present challenges.
This is not a West Indies-specific dilemma. Even Brazil, the spiritual home of football, has tried bringing back legends into coaching and management roles. Yet their national team continues to struggle.
The greatness of the past, while inspiring, does not automatically translate into success in the present.
West Indies cricket finds itself in a similar position. Until we prioritise long-term player development, invest in grassroots programmes, modernise training infrastructure, and instil discipline and professionalism from youth levels up, changing administrators will be like rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship.
The Shell Cricket Academy, once based at St George’s University (SGU) in Grenada, was one of the most promising initiatives ever undertaken for the development of West Indies cricket, spearheaded by Dr Rudi Webster. The academy aimed to provide young cricketers with a structured, high-performance environment that combined technical training with psychological development, fitness, and education.
It was a pioneering model—one that had the potential to transform the cricketing landscape across the region by producing well-rounded athletes prepared for the rigours of international competition. However, rather than rallying around the initiative, internal territorial politics began to creep in. Some territories questioned why the academy was based in Grenada and lobbied for it to be relocated or duplicated elsewhere. Instead of strengthening the initiative collectively, regional divisions began to undermine its foundation.
Dr Webster’s leadership and vision came under pressure, not due to shortcomings in the programme but because of the old, familiar problem of insular thinking and turf protection. Eventually, Shell, the title sponsor and key financial backer, pulled out, disillusioned by the lack of unified regional support and direction. What could have been a flagship development programme for West Indies cricket was left to wither, a victim of short-sightedness and fragmented ambition.
The collapse of the Shell Cricket Academy is a reminder of how internal rivalries and a failure to support long-term development can be costly, not just in terms of missed opportunities but in the very progress we claim to want for West Indies cricket.
There are broader regional efforts aimed at addressing the crisis. The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) has a dedicated Prime Ministerial Sub-Committee on Cricket, chaired by Guyana’s President, Dr Irfaan Ali. The group has held several meetings to assess the current state of the game and chart a roadmap for the future. They’ve reviewed the outcomes of a regional cricket conference and even discussed avenues for funding the sport at the regional level.
Yet even CARICOM’s involvement has its limits. A decade ago, a detailed final report by the CARICOM Cricket Review Panel was submitted following months of consultation with stakeholders. The report included sweeping recommendations on governance reform, many of which have been adopted by Cricket West Indies (CWI). Still, the results on the field have not improved in any meaningful or consistent way.
This raises an important point: regional governments, while having the right to support and scrutinise cricket, must also widen their focus to sports as a whole. Cricket cannot be the only vehicle for regional pride or development. A holistic approach to sports—encompassing education, health, youth empowerment, and economic opportunity—will lay a foundation that benefits all disciplines.
In the meantime, West Indies fans must be willing to face an uncomfortable truth: no single administrator, coach, or cricket legend can wave a magic wand to restore former glory. The change must begin at the grassroots, in the attitudes of players, the systems that develop them, and the values we promote across the sporting spectrum.
The scoreboard at Sabina Park tells a painful story. But it is not the first, and it won’t be the last unless we choose a different path—one rooted in realism, responsibility, and long-term resolve.
Saturday, July 12, 2025
Caribbean Anti-Doping Official Warns Athletes Against Participation in Controversial Enhanced Games
A leading Caribbean anti-doping authority has issued a firm warning to regional athletes to steer clear of the controversial Enhanced Games set to debut in August 2026.
Speaking on the TalkSports programme on Saturday, Dr Adrian Lorde, Chair of the National Anti-Doping Commission of Barbados, cautioned athletes about the serious health risks linked to performance-enhancing drug use despite the event’s promise of substantial financial rewards.
During the live interview with host Michael Bascombe, Dr Lorde emphasised that the allure of lucrative earnings should never eclipse the potential physical and ethical dangers involved. “Athletes must weigh the immediate gains against the long-term impact on their health and the integrity of their careers,” he said. “Doping carries risks that extend well beyond the playing field, including severe medical complications and lasting damage to an athlete’s reputation.”
Earlier this week, the Caribbean Regional Anti-Doping Organisation (RADO) released a formal statement condemning the Enhanced Games concept in unequivocal terms. The organisation labelled the event as “abhorrent,” particularly because it promotes various forms of doping, whether state-sponsored, medically supervised, or otherwise.
“The encouragement of any form of doping, whether state-sponsored, ‘medically-guided’ or otherwise, is abhorrent,” the statement declared. “Those who engage in such practices should not enter clean sport, nor hold the title of champion, record holder or otherwise. Beyond competition, any individual or group that supports these Games should hold no position of leadership in sport or other sanctioned competition.”
RADO further warned that the Enhanced Games represent a fundamental threat to the values that underpin global sport. “The Enhanced Games can be seen as a body which is attempting to undermine and contaminate what the global sports movement continually works hard to protect and preserve.”
Dr Lorde reinforced this position, urging Caribbean athletes and sports organisations to take a unified stand. “We encourage all athletes, particularly those in the Caribbean, to steer clear of the Enhanced Games and the significant risks they entail — both to personal health and to the integrity of sport,” he said.
The National Anti-Doping Commission of Barbados and RADO concluded by calling on all Caribbean sports bodies to publicly oppose the Enhanced Games, ensuring that the region continues to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct and athlete safety.


