Sports Commentary by Michael Bascombe
The elections are over, and now
the real work begins for the newly elected executive of the Grenada Athletics
Association (GAA).
Congratulations to President
Johnell Mitchell and his team. We wish them well because Grenadian athletics
needs them to succeed.
This is an opportunity for a new
beginning, not simply a change of names around the executive table, but a
different approach to how the sport is administered, how athletes are treated,
and how the association communicates with its stakeholders.
Judging from the many comments
during Saturday's TalkSports programme, rebuilding trust must be
among the new executive's immediate priorities.
Current national athlete Gamali
Felix offered perhaps the clearest assessment when he said the GAA needs
greater "transparency, accountability, and people who genuinely care about
the sport and the athletes."
Felix also pointed to Grenada's
talent, facilities, and potential, while calling for clearer communication about
funding, development, team selections, and the overall direction of athletics.
Former national athletes
Nathaniel Mark and Kim Fullerton expressed similar sentiments. Mark called for
"a fresh approach built on openness, accountability, strong
leadership," while Fullerton argued that "the same old can't be
acceptable."
Those voices should not be
ignored or treated as criticism for criticism's sake. They give the new
executive an indication of where some of the dissatisfaction exists and,
importantly, where the rebuilding process can begin.
Athletes, including those
attending high schools and colleges at home and overseas, should feel connected
to the GAA throughout the year, not only when national teams are being
selected. There have been complaints from athletes about feeling neglected and
then suddenly being contacted when their services are required to represent
Grenada.
Parents have also used social
media to express frustration over communication, the treatment of athletes, and,
at times, their interaction with administrators.
That relationship needs
attention.
Mitchell now has an opportunity
to demonstrate his leadership and establish an administration with its own
identity and direction. This is his opportunity to lead, while drawing on the
experience and skills of the people elected alongside him.
Governance must also be part of
that new direction. The GAA's constitution, by-laws, membership requirements,
electoral procedures, and other important documents should be easily accessible.
Clubs and affiliates must understand their responsibilities and rights, and
communication cannot become something that happens only around elections or
major championships.
There are also opportunities
beyond administration.
The InterCol Championships
provide the GAA with a ready-made platform to strengthen relationships with
schools, identify emerging talent, and develop commercial partnerships.
Grenadian athletics has a product that corporate Grenada should be encouraged
to support, but it must be packaged and managed professionally.
Grenada has produced Olympic
champions, world champions, and internationally respected athletes. The
administrative structure supporting the sport should aspire to the same
standard.
If Mitchell and his executive members can
work collectively, put aside egos and past differences, listen to athletes and
clubs, and genuinely place development first, the GAA can move along a
different trajectory.
And congratulations to everyone
who offered themselves for service during the elections. Their expertise should
not be lost. There should be opportunities for them to contribute through the
GAA's various subcommittees.
The election is finished. Now
comes the harder part: rebuilding trust, restoring confidence, and charting a
new course for Grenadian athletics.




